"Terminus" / Hebrews 10:1-18 / Hanson Rosenquist

In this passage the author of the book of Hebrews concludes his teaching on the Lord Jesus Christ Himself being the final, once-for-all sacrifice for sin which therefore abrogates the old covenant sacrificial system. Whereas animal sacrifice could do not more than remind of sin, Christ Jesus beings lasting forgiveness. Keep this context in mind as you discuss these questions.

1. In what sense was the law (Gk. nomos; meaning in this context the old covenant religious system) "a shadow of the good things to come"? What were the good things to come?

2. What argument does the author of Hebrews use in v. 2 to show that the animal sacrifices could not bring lasting forgiveness? Why is this significant?

3. Verse 4 declares that it is impossible for animal sacrifices to take away sins. What does that mean for the sin problem of the human race?

4. Consequently, when Christ came into the world, what did He need to bring lasting forgiveness for sin (vv. 5-7)?

5. According to vv. 9-10, what are the effects of Christ Jesus' sacrifice of Himself?

6. How do vv. 11-14 demonstrate the finality of Christ's sacrifice? That is, how do these verses show that there is no further sacrifice needed?

7. In what way(s) are vv. 17b-18 good news for you personally?